Sunday, October 28, 2012

Warmist Stephan Lewandowsky resurfaces: Now he writes an unreviewed blog post suggesting that we shouldn't trust unreviewed blog posts

The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus
It also explains why climate deniers expend considerable effort to negate the existence of that consensus, using the usual array of deceptive techniques such as pseudo-experts, or pointing to unreviewed blog-posts as “evidence” for their contrarian positions.

1 comment:

Otter said...

lewandorkski's blog post is one of the biggest crocks of $#it I have ever had the misfortune to read.